Anesth Pain Med Search

CLOSE


Anesth Pain Med > Volume 11(2); 2016 > Article
Yoon, Jeong, Jung, Yoon, Kim, and Kim: An analysis of consultations requested to a pain clinic

Abstract

Background:

The study investigated in detail the current status of the consultations requested in a pain clinic. We evaluated the characteristics of the consultations to determine the kind of contents requested, referring departments and factors including demographics, co-morbidities, previous medical problems, and the descriptions of the reasons for the consultation to the pain clinic.

Methods:

Clinical data were collected in the authors’ institution between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2013. The medical records were reviewed and compared. Characteristics of both outpatients and inpatients were analysed.

Results:

Data from 1,140 patients was available for this study. Seven hundred thirteen individuals belonged to the outpatient group and 427 individuals belonged to the inpatient group. Orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, and otolaryngology were the main departments that requested consultations to the pain clinic. The most frequent requested lesion and diagnostic term were low back and lumbar spinal stenosis, respectively, and the most common reason for consulting was for “control of pain not controlled by medications.” Factors that were significantly different between the two groups were gender, questions about other illnesses apart from the main diagnoses, history of specific diseases, acute onset, cancer, operation within 3 months, and physical system abnormalities.

Conclusions:

The medical problems addressed by a pain clinic consultation service were diverse. It is rational to develop standardized guidelines for pain consultations, and treatment strategies aimed at alleviating pain per se as well as caring for comorbid conditions.

INTRODUCTION

Medical consultation is the process by which physicians pass on advice about a patient’s state to specialists and make sure the patients are provided with appropriate specialty-related treatment as well as reflect their medical opinions to their management [1]. The courses of consultation that can result involve identification and assessment of health problems, advocacy of the best approach for patient care, developing effective interdisciplinary communication and skills necessary for patient care, and educating trainees [1,2]. This makes it easy for doctors to construct a pain management, conduct additional examinations, increase the quality of patient care, and achieve early discharge [1]. Particularly the consultations referred to the pain clinic look like the special considerations. Clinicians in a hospital are faced daily with many questions related to a patient’s pain problem. Consultants from other departments’ expect the pain physician to estimate the pain by patients and address tricky situations. However, there is little previous research on consultations in other departments that refer patients to pain clinics. Therefore, we thought it would be meaningful to collect the characteristics of the patients visiting the pain clinic and analyse the data from cases referred to a pain clinic. This study was done to better the perception and expectation of other department’s doctors to the pain clinic, with the goal of identifying priorities of pain specialists.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical data of patients referred to the pain clinic from other departments at our hospital between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2013 was collected. Pain specialists replied to questions regarding outpatients who visited the pain clinic and their visits with hospitalized patients. Retrospective comparison between characteristics of outpatients and inpatients was done. The number of outpatients visits to the pain clinic and, hospitalized patients referrals to the clinic were determined by year.
We investigated the distribution of gender of the referred patients, age, departments that requested pain clinic consultation, lesions causing chief complaints, causes of illness, and expressions described. Underlying co-morbidities were classified into cardiovascular, respiratory, endocrinal, gastrointestinal, central nervous system, genitourinary, hematologic, and others.
For statistical analysis, we performed univariate logistic regression to identify the difference between two groups. A P value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

We collected the data from 1,140 patients. Of these 713 were outpatients and 427 were inpatients. The number of outpatient visits was 838 in 2009, 1,721 in 2010, 2,598 in 2011, 3,387 in 2012, and 3,722 in 2013. Consultations of patients from other departments involved 89 patients in 2009, 166 in 2010, 160 in 2011, 150 in 2012, and 148 in 2013. The number of consultations of hospitalized patients from other departments was 61 in 2009, 65 in 2010, 88 in 2011, 92 in 2012, and 121 in 2013 (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Number of patients referred to the pain clinic compared to increased number of outpatients visited without consults.
APM_11_201_fig_1.jpg
The 1140 patients comprised 385 men (33.8%) and 755 women (66.2%). The aged ranged from 13 to 95 years. The median age was 58.0 years and the number of individuals over 60 was 511 (44.8%). Orthopedic surgery (60.6%), dermatology (7.2%), and neurosurgery (6.7%) were the main departments that requested outpatient consultations to the pain clinic. Orthopedic surgery (12.9%), neurosurgery (12.2%), and hemato-oncology (10.1%) were the main source of inpatients referrals (Fig. 2). Among all outpatients, 26.2% suffered from low back pain, 21.5% from pain in the shoulder and upper arm, and 8.6% from neck pain. Of the inpatients, 22.0% complained of low back pain, 11.9% of abdominal pain, and 12.6% of facial problems (Fig. 3). The most frequent diagnostic terms used to describe outpatients were lumbar spinal stenosis (14.4%), herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia (9.8%), and cervical radiculopathy (6.9%). Most frequent diagnostic terms for, inpatients were cancer pain (17.1%), herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia (9.1%), and lumbar spinal stenosis (7.7%) (Fig. 4). The most common expressions used by the requesting doctors in the outpatient group were for “control of pain not controlled by medications” (60.4%), “request for a nerve block” (16.1%) and “investigation, diagnosis, and treatment in the pain clinic” (5.0%) (Table 1). The common expressions for the inpatient group were the same for the outpatient group, with a respective incidence of 40.7%, 30.9%, and 7.7% (Table 1). Rare reasons for requesting a consultation include evaluating disability rating, issuing an insurance paper, and receiving medicolegal attention. Questions about medications included those regarding side effects, opioids addiction, dosage, and changing to another drug. The factors that showed the significant higher incidence in inpatient group were male gender, questions about other illnesses apart from the main diagnoses, history of trauma, acuteness, cancer, previous surgery in the past 3 months, and respiratory, endocrinal, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and central nervous system abnormalities, the prevalence of rheumatic diseases was higher in outpatients (Table 2).
Fig. 2
Departments requesting pain clinic consultation. OS: orthopedic surgery, NS: neurosurgery, PS: plastic surgery, Hemato-Onco: hematology and oncology, GY: gynecology, GI: gastrointestinology, GS: general surgery, OB: obstetrics, CS: chest surgery.
APM_11_201_fig_2.jpg
Fig. 3
Classification of lesions causing chief complaints.
APM_11_201_fig_3.jpg
Fig. 4
The top 20 diseases for consultation. PHN: post-herpetic neuralgia, CRPS: complex regional pain syndrome, MFPS: myofascial pain syndrome, SSNHL: sudden sensorineural hearing loss, CPSP: central post-stroke pain syndrome.
APM_11_201_fig_4.jpg
Table 1
Frequent Expressions Described for Consultation
Outpatient group (n = 713) Inpatient group (n = 427)
For control of pain uncontrolled by medications 431 For control of pain uncontrolled by medications 174
Request for a nerve block 115 Request for a nerve block 132
For diagnosis, examination, and treatment of the pain clinic 36 For diagnosis, examination, and treatment of the pain clinic 33
Control of postoperative pain 28 For further evaluation and proper management 27
For injection therapy 15 Request for PCA 22
Request for TPI 13 Questions of the medications* 8
Request for diagnostic block to decide the operative lesion 8 Patient’s hope to undergo management of the pain clinic 5
Patient’s desire to receive non-operative management 7 Epidural labor analgesia 4
For further evaluation and proper management 6 Epidural blood patch 3
Questions of the medications* 4 Request for TPI 3

Values are number of patients. PCA: patient-controlled analgesia, TPI: trigger point injection.

* Questions about medications include those regarding side effects, opioids addiction, dosage, and changing to another drug.

Table 2
Results of Univariate Logistic Regression
Outpatient group (n = 713) Inpatient group (n = 427) OR (95%CI) P value
Demographic factors
 Male 215 (30.15) 170 (39.81) 1.53 (1.19-1.97) 0.0009
 Age (> 60 years) 305 (42.78) 206 (48.24) 1.25 (0.98-1.59) 0.0726
Clinical factors
 Questions about other illnesses apart from the main diagnosis 65 (9.12) 119 (27.84) 3.85 (2.77-5.36) <0.0001
 Other department’s invasive procedures 20 (2.81) 10 (2.34) 0.83 (0.39-1.79) 0.6368
 Trauma 46 (6.45) 49 (11.48) 1.88 (1.23-2.87) 0.0034
 Rheumatologic disease 74 (10.38) 17 (3.98) 0.36 (0.21-0.62) 0.0002
 Psychiatric diseases 88 (12.34) 66 (15.46) 1.30 (0.92-1.83) 0.1372
 Acuteness 65 (9.12) 125 (29.27) 4.13 (2.97-5.73) <0.0001
 Cancer 25 (3.51) 84 (19.67) 6.74 (4.23-0.73) <0.0001
 Previous operation before 3 months 57 (7.99) 74 (17.33) 2.41 (1.67-3.49) <0.0001
Abnormality factors
 Cardiovascular 509 (71.39) 307 (71.90) 1.03 (0.79-1.34) 0.8540
 Respiratory 39 (5.47) 57 (13.35) 2.66 (1.74-4.08) <0.0001
 Endocrine 131 (18.37) 123 (28.81) 1.80 (1.36-2.38) <0.0001
 Gatrointestinal 63 (8.84) 74 (17.33) 2.16 (1.51-3.10) <0.0001
 Hematologic 9 (1.26) 11 (2.58) 2.07 (0.85-5.03) 0.1092
 Genitourinary 33 (4.63) 58 (13.58) 3.24 (2.07-5.06) <0.0001
 Gastrointestinal nervous system 55 (7.71) 49 (11.48) 1.55 (1.03-2.33) 0.0338
 Musculoskeletal 86 (12.06) 64 (14.99) 1.29 (0.91-1.82) 0.1578

Values are number of patients (%). The significance criteria were set at 0.05.

DISCUSSION

Pain is the most frequent complaint of patients who visit clinicians [3,4]. Poor outcomes can often result from inadequate assessment and treatment by a professional without the proper training to manage the pain disorders [5,6]. The accuracy of a clinical judgement depends on consultation with pain specialists with medical training and experience in a variety of pain diseases [5,6]. A pain clinic is capable of systematic pain management by specialized pain clinicians, with consulting assistance by other physicians. A pain clinic generally acts as a consultation resource for other medical specialties, in a process where associated doctors seek the advice of pain specialist’s concerning decision-making on a range of topics including diagnosis and therapies, and use the information to guide case management. Consultation includes the treatment planning, diagnosis, and additional checkup, ultimately supporting a doctor’s referral and making patients comfortable [1].
Since the pain clinic was established in 1995 at Bucheon St. Mary Hospital, the overall number of patients has increased. Although the rates of referral from other departments to pain clinic patients varies from hospital to hospital due to institutional factors including composition, size, and tradition, past investigations reveal relatively high rates [4,7]. Presently, the number of hospitalized patients consulted from other department steadily increased, but the number of outpatients consulted decreased slightly. The proportion of latter to the overall number of outpatients decreased continuously. This would reflect the increased tendency of patients to visit the pain clinic of their own volition rather than being referred from other hospital departments. This may be due to increased public’s awareness about pain clinics. The increasing referral of hospitalized patients from other departments is thought to be due to the increased recognition of the value of the pain clinic by other physicians.
In this study, hospitalized men with pain problems had a tendency to be referred to our pain clinic. It is conceivable that there are high-risk male inpatients who receive consultations. The mean age of all patients in our study was 57.4 years, similar to prior studies [8-11].
Patients were most often referred from the department of orthopedic surgery. This may reflect the fact that incurable pain manifests in many degenerative diseases [8]. Most patients in pain clinics included age groups associated with degenerative change [9]. Also, the finding the one-quarter of patients suffered from low back pain, with lumbar spinal stenosis as the most frequently requested diagnostic term are consistent with other studies [4,12,13]. The high ratio of patients with low back pain who are referred to a pain clinic may reflect other clinician’s prejudiced impression that the chief function of a pain clinic is to remedy backache [9]. The validity of this speculation is reinforced by the present demonstration that the most frequent lesion was low back area in both outpatient and inpatient groups.
A pain clinic consultation may be helpful in managing complications and treating pain induced by surgeries, injections, and invasive procedures performed by other departments. The consultants expect pain physicians to perform nerve blocking procedures when encountering pain that is not responsive to medications [14,15]. Nerve block is a common practice in pain clinics [8,9,15].
Critical care patients and terminal cancer patients are being increasingly referred to pain clinics for palliative pain control. Cancer pain is complicated and can be irreversible; a multidisciplinary therapy team approach in cooperation with the pain physician may be able to achieve better results [2,9]. Co-morbidities among these patients also requires careful considerations in the consultation process [1,10,16]. A preponderance of questions about other illnesses apart from the main diagnosis and a history of trauma place an emphasis on co-morbid diseases in hospitalized patients. A number of pain disorders stem from traumatic injury [17,18]. Injury-related pain can progress to illness that drives referral of patients to pain clinics [5]. Patients with rheumatic disease have an increased tendency for pain clinic referral due to the unusual manifestations of pain [19-22]. The relatively high prevalence of rheumatic diseases among outpatients may reflect the insufficient efficacy of medication alone in rheumatology [23]. Although there was no statistical significance, the overall incidence of mental illness (13.5%) in our survey is further evidence of the prevalence of mental abnormalities among patients with chronic pain [24]. Nicholson and Verma [5] revealed potential biopsychosocial risks among patients with chronic pain and emphasized that patients with disease-associated pain must be screened for psychiatric disorders. The finding of more patients with cancer or a history of surgery in the past 3 months in the inpatient group compared to the outpatient group is understandable considering the severity of the disease and procedure.
The study had several limitations. Firstly, our institution is a secondary teaching university-affiliated hospital, which might influence patient features and/or outcome. Our institution lacks the variety of equipment available to pain therapy at specialized organizations, such like multidisciplinary pain clinics. Further studies should address multi-institutional and subspecialty cases including palliative care and particularly difficult cases requiring advanced intervention. Secondly, there is the possibility that we may not have directly understood other clinicians’ intentions because we dealt with only written descriptions. More research is necessary to determine why other specialists make referral decisions to the pain clinic and the variety of factors that influence their decisions [25]. The methodologically retrospective approach could have resulted in such a limitation.
It is important to pay attention to developing treatment strategies aimed at alleviating pain per se as well as caring for comorbid conditions. Pain often passes untreated or under-treated, often because of insufficient understanding of the nature of pain among physicians [3]. Education regarding pain medicine should be promoted in medical schools and training institutions [6]. In addition, many cases of postoperative pain seem to reflect a tendency of surgeons to under-estimate the importance of postoperative pain including the relatively high prevalence of neuropathic pain [2,26,27]. All patients with pain conditions should be evaluated by professional pain clinicians with proper training to assess severity and to arrange appropriate management [5]. The present findings imply that pain clinic consultations are sought with the expectation of better patient outcome by clinicians from other departments with respect to diverse pain problems. Also it is rational to develop standardized guidelines for pain consultations immediately. As the role of pain clinics expands, further research is needed to clarify the essence of successful consultation and associated factors. A multifactorial approach allows for the maximized relief of patients from correlative pain conditions and their satisfaction.

REFERENCES

1. Caputo GM, Gross RJ. In: Gross RJ, Caputo GM, Function of a general internal medicine consultation service. editors. Kammer and Gross’ Medical Consultation. 1998. 3rd ed. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins. p. 9-18.

2. Son SO. The approaches to postoperative pain management. J Korean Pain Soc 1995; 8: 1-7.

3. Niv D, Devor M. Position paper of the European Federation of IASP Chapters (EFIC) on the subject of pain management. Eur J Pain 2007; 11: 487-9. PMID: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.03.005. PMID: 17433738.
crossref pmid
4. Seo CM, Mun CW, Baek UY, Hong JG. A survey of patients visiting pain clinic. J Korean Pain Soc 2000; 13: 224-31.

5. Nicholson B, Verma S. Comorbidities in chronic neuropathic pain. Pain Med 2004; 5: S1-27. PMID: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2004.04019.x.
crossref pmid pdf
6. Fishbain DA, Cutler R, Rosomoff HL, Rosomoff RS. Chronic pain disability exaggeration/malingering and submaximal effort research. Clin J Pain 1999; 15: 244-74. PMID: 10.1097/00002508-199912000-00002. PMID: 10617254.
crossref pmid
7. Davies HT, Crombie IK, Macrae WA, Rogers KM. Pain clinic patients in northern Britain. The Pain Clinic 1991; 5: 129-35.

8. Choe H, Oh KH, Song JJ, Han YJ. Pain clinic 10 years at Chonbuk national university. J Korean Pain Soc 1995; 8: 110-6.

9. Lim KI, Kim BK, Sohn HS. A clinical survey of the patients of pain clinic. J Korean Pain Soc 1998; 11: 288-93.

10. Jang YH, Lee JK, Cheun JK, Chung JK. A clinical survey of paients of pain clinic. J Korean Pain Soc 1995; 8: 103-9.

11. Andersson HI, Ejlertsson G, Leden I, Rosenberg C. Chronic pain in a geographically defined general population: studies of differences in age, gender, social class, and pain localization. Clin J Pain 1993; 9: 174-82. PMID: 10.1097/00002508-199309000-00004. PMID: 8219517.
crossref pmid
12. Strine TW, Hootman JM. US national prevalence and correlates of low back and neck pain among adults. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 57: 656-65. PMID: 10.1002/art.22684. PMID: 17471542.
crossref pmid
13. Shin SH, Chung YP, Lim JJ, Yoon KB, Kim C. A clinical survey of patients of neuro-pain clinic. J Korean Pain Soc 1994; 7: 84-7.

14. Shiotani M. Nerve blocking techniques for pain clinic. J Korean Pain Soc 1992; 5: 1-8.

15. Hicks F, Simpson KH. Nerve blocks in palliative care. 2004. Oxford, Oxford university press. p. 33-41. PMID: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198527039.001.0001. PMID: 15163007.

16. Kumar A. Organization and development of pain clinics and palliative care in developing countries. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004; 21: 169-72. PMID: 10.1097/00003643-200403000-00001. PMID: 15055887.
crossref pmid
17. Gallagher RM, Rauh V, Haugh LD, Milhous R, Callas PW, Langelier R, et al. Determinants of return-to-work among low back pain patients. Pain 1989; 39: 55-67. PMID: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90175-9.
crossref pmid
18. van Wilgen CP, Keizer D. Neuropathic pain mechanisms in patients with chronic sports injuries: a diagnostic model useful in sports medicine? Pain Med 2011; 12: 110-7. PMID: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.01023.x. PMID: 21143763.
crossref pmid pdf
19. Koop SM, ten Klooster PM, Vonkeman HE, Steunebrink LM, van de Laar MA. Neuropathic-like pain features and cross-sectional associations in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2015; 17: 237PMID: 10.1186/s13075-015-0761-8. PMID: 26335941. PMID: PMC4558794.
crossref pmid pmc
20. Fitzcharles MA, Almahrezi A, Ware MA. Clinical profile of rheumatic disease patients referred to a multidisciplinary pain center. J Rheumatol 2004; 31: 359-63. PMID: 14760809.
pmid
21. Marks JL, Colebatch AN, Buchbinder R, Edwards CJ. Pain management for rheumatoid arthritis and cardiovascular or renal comorbidity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 10: CD008952PMID: 10.1002/14651858.cd008952.pub2.
crossref
22. Radner H, Ramiro S, van der Heijde DM, Landewé R, Buchbinder R, Aletaha D. How do gastrointestinal or liver comorbidities influence the choice of pain treatment in inflammatory arthritis? A Cochrane systematic review. J Rheumatol Suppl 2012; 90: 74-80. PMID: 10.3899/jrheum.120346. PMID: 22942333.
crossref pmid
23. Ramiro S, Radner H, van der Heijde D, van Tubergen A, Buchbinder R, Aletaha D, et al. Combination therapy for pain management in inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, other spondyloarthritis). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 10: CD008886PMID: 10.1002/14651858.cd008886.pub2.
crossref
24. Romano JM, Turner JA. Chronic pain and depression: does the evidence support a relationship? Psychol Bull 1985; 97: 18-34. PMID: 10.1037/0033-2909.97.1.18. PMID: 3983297.
crossref pmid pdf
25. Pupa LE Jr, Coventry JA, Hanley JF, Carpenter JL. Factors affecting compliance for general medicine consultations to non-internists. Am J Med 1986; 81: 508-14. PMID: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90307-4.
crossref pmid
26. Searle RD, Howell SJ, Bennett MI. Diagnosing postoperative neuropathic pain: a Delphi survey. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109: 240-4. PMID: 10.1093/bja/aes147. PMID: 22649184.
crossref pmid pdf
27. Miaskowski C, Crews J, Ready LB, Paul SM, Ginsberg B. Anesthesia-based pain services improve the quality of postoperative pain management. Pain 1999; 80: 23-9. PMID: 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00192-4.
crossref pmid
TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+ Line it
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •    
  • 3,151 View
  • 20 Download
Related articles in Anesth Pain Med

Analysis of unanticipated admission after outpatient anesthesia2010 April;5(2)



ABOUT
ARTICLE & TOPICS
Article category

Browse all articles >

Topics

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
101-3503, Lotte Castle President, 109 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04146, Korea
Tel: +82-2-792-5128    Fax: +82-2-792-4089    E-mail: apm@anesthesia.or.kr                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Society of Anesthesiologists.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next