Effect of short-term prewarming on body temperature in arthroscopic shoulder surgery
Article information
Abstract
Background:
Hypothermia (< 36°C) is common during arthroscopic shoulder surgery. It is known that 30 to 60 minutes of prewarming can prevent perioperative hypothermia by decreasing body heat redistribution. However, the effect of short-term prewarming (less than 30 minutes) on body temperature in such surgery has not been reported yet. Therefore, the aim of this prospective study was to investigate the effect of short-term prewarming for less than 30 minutes using forced-air warming device on body temperature during interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) procedure in arthroscopic shoulder surgery before general anesthesia.
Methods:
We randomly assigned patients scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery to receive either cotton blanket (not pre-warmed, group C, n = 26) or forced-air warming device (pre-warmed, group F, n = 26). Temperature was recorded every 15 minutes from entering the operating room until leaving post-anesthetic care unit (PACU). Shivering and thermal comfort scale were evaluated during their stay in the PACU.
Results:
There were significant differences in body temperature between group C and group F from 30 minutes after induction of general anesthesia to 30 minutes after arrival in the PACU (P < 0.05). The median duration of prewarming in group F was 14 min (range: 9–23 min). There was no significant difference in thermal comfort scale or shivering between the two groups in PACU.
Conclusions:
Our results showed that short-term prewarming using a forced-air warming device during ISBPB in arthroscopic shoulder surgery had beneficial effect on perioperative hypothermia.
INTRODUCTION
Hypothermia is defined when the core temperature is lower than 36°C. Patients undergoing surgery is prone to hypothermia because anesthetics can induce impairment of thermoregulation and cold environment. Perioperative hypothermia causes many problems such as blood clotting disorder [1], delayed wound healing and wound infection [2], cardiac complications [3], delayed recovery from anesthetics [4], and thermal discomfort [5].
During arthroscopic shoulder surgery, a large amount of irrigation fluids stored at room temperature are used to improve the clarity of surgical field [6]. But a large amount of irrigation fluids stored at room temperature cause decrease in body temperature [7]. Previous studies have revealed that using warmed and humidified inspired gas [8] or warmed irrigation fluids is ineffective in preventing perioperative hypothermia [6,7].
Preventive methods include skin surface warming [9], warm and humidified circuit [10], and administering fluid or warming blood using specific devices [11]. Among these methods, forced-air warming is a very effective and safe method [12]. Forbes et al. [13] have recommended prewarming for 30 minutes before surgery to prevent perioperative hypothermia. Sessler et al. [14] have concluded that peripheral compartment heat content is increased in clinically important amounts within 30 minutes of warming. However, it is impractical to warm for more than 30 minutes due to thermal discomfort and congestion of pre-anesthetic care unit. The effect of short-term prewarming (less than 30 minutes) on body temperature during arthroscopic shoulder surgery has not reported yet.
Therefore, the aim of this prospective study was to investigate the effect of short-term prewarming using forced-air warming device on body temperature during interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) in arthroscopic shoulder surgery before general anesthesia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Written informed consent was obtained from patients aged between 20 to 65 years. Patients with temperature above 37.5°C measured with a tympanic thermometer, history of malignant hyperthermia, or conversion to open shoulder surgery were excluded. Using random allocation software, patients were divided into two groups: 1) cotton blanket group (not pre-warmed, group C), patients were covered with warm cotton blanket stored in heating cabinet; and 2) forced-air warming group (pre-warmed, group F), patients were warmed using forced-air warming device (Bair Hugger Model 505, Arizant Healthcare Inc., USA) during the procedure of ISBPB for prewarming. The device had the highest setting of 43°C.
Initial body temperature was measured with tympanic thermometer (ThermoScan IRT 6020, Braun, Germany) immediately after the patient was transferred to the operation room. Ambient temperature of the operation room was maintained at 21–23°C. That of post-anesthetic care unit (PACU) was maintained at 23–25°C. All patients were given 3 mg of midazolam and 50 μg of fentanyl intravenously before ISBPB procedure. ISBPB was performed using 12 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine containing 5 mg of dexamethasone under ultrasound guidance. General anesthesia was induced using propofol 2 mg/kg. Endotracheal tube was inserted after relaxation achieved by rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg. General anesthesia was maintained using desflurane and 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen mixture based on bispectral index score between 40 and 60. Mechanical ventilation was controlled to maintain an end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration of 30–35 mmHg. Esophageal thermometer (DeRoyal®, DeRoyal Industries, Inc., USA) was inserted after intubation and temperature was continuously monitored and recorded every 15 minutes until the end of surgery. The lowest temperature during surgery was also recorded for evaluation of incidence and severity of hypothermia. All patients were positioned with the operative side facing upward. Patients in both groups were warmed with forced-air warming device below the level of xiphoid process intraoperatively. Additional 50 μg of fentanyl was injected intravenously immediately before surgery. Irrigation fluids stored at room temperature (21–23°C) in the operation room were used for surgery. On arrival at the PACU, postoperative temperature was measured with a tympanic thermometer to evaluate the incidence of hypothermia. Body temperature was measured every 15 minutes until leaving the PACU. Shivering and thermal comfort scale were recorded on arrival at PACU. Shivering was observed by blinded research assistant. Thermal comfort scale and numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score were recorded. Thermal comfort scale was recorded as 0 point for no cold, 1 point for moderate cold, and 2 points for unbearable cold. Pain score was evaluated using NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). If the patient felt cold or postoperative temperature was lower than 36°C, forced-air warming was used in PACU.
The primary outcome was perioperative body temperature of the two groups. A sample size of 54 was required to detect a temperature difference of 0.5°C with a type I (α) error of 0.05 and type II (β) error 0.2 (80% power) considering 10% possible data loss. Continuous variables were analyzed using independent t test while categorical variables were analyzed using Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Repeated measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction was used to compare changes in temperature between the two groups. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (ver. 22.0; IBM Corp., USA). P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
For this study, 54 patients were enrolled initially. However, 2 patients were excluded due to delayed recovery from general anesthesia and conversion to open surgery (Fig. 1). There was no significant difference in age, operation room temperature, operation time, amount of intravenous fluid, volume of irrigation fluid, or duration of ISBPB procedure between the two groups (Table 1). The median duration of prewarming in group F was 14 min (range: 9–23 min).
Flowchart of inclusion/exclusion of patients in the study.
Patient Characteristics and Perioperative Clinical Data
The temperature on arrival at operation room did not differ significantly between the two groups (36.6 ± 0.4°C in group C and 36.8 ± 0.4°C in group F, P = 0.156, Table 2). There were significant differences in body temperature between group C and group F from 30 minutes after induction of general anesthesia to 30 minutes after arrival in the PACU (P = 0.039 at 30 minutes after induction; P = 0.003 at 45 minutes after induction; P = 0.001 at 60 minutes after induction; P = 0.004 at the end of surgery; P < 0.001 on arrival at PACU; P < 0.001 at 30 minutes after admission to PACU, Fig. 2). The temperature on arrival at PACU for patients in group C was significantly lower than that for patients in group F (35.6 ± 0.4°C in group C and 36.1 ± 0.4°C in group F, P < 0.001, Table 2).
Perioperative Temperature and Incidence of Intraoperative and Postoperative Hypothermia
Intraoperative and postoperative temperatures (°C). Error bars indicate SD of temperature readings at each time. Baseline: Temperature upon arrival at the operation room, T0–60: Temperature immediately to 60 min after induction of general anesthesia (checked every 15 minutes), TEnd: Temperature at the end of surgery, P1: Temperature upon arrival at post-anesthetic care unit (PACU), P2: Temperature at 30 min after admission to PACU. Body temperatures were measured by esophageal thermometer intraoperatively and by tympanic thermometer at baseline and in PACU. There were significant differences in perioperative body temperatures between two groups (*P < 0.05, †P < 0.001, compared with group C).
The incidence of hypothermia in the operation room was 96.2% (25/26) in group C and 57.7% (15/26) in group F (P = 0.003, Table 2). The incidence of hypothermia in PACU was 69.2% (18/26) in group C and 34.6% (9/26) in group F (P = 0.026, Table 2). Twenty percent of patients in F group and 40% of patients in group C showed moderate hypothermia intraoperatively. However, severities of hypothermia were not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.239, Table 2). Percentages of patients who felt moderate cold were not significantly different between the two groups (26.9% in group C and 19.2% in group F, P = 0.743, Table 2). No shivering occurred in either group during stay in PACU. There was no significant difference in NRS pain score between the two groups.
DISCUSSION
In the present study, prewarming for less than 30 minutes using a forced-air warming device during ISBPB procedure in arthroscopic shoulder surgery had beneficial effect on perioperative hypothermia. Characteristic pattern of decrease in temperature under general anesthesia is divided into three phases. The first phase shows rapid decrease in temperature due to core-to-peripheral redistribution of body heat within 1 hour after induction of general anesthesia. In the second phase, a slow and linear fashion of decrease will occur for 2 to 4 hours simply due to heat loss exceeding metabolic heat production. In the third phase, core temperature will reach a plateau and remain constantly until the end of the surgery at 3 to 4 hours after the induction of general anesthesia [15].
Vanni et al. [16] have reported that it is as more effective to perform both preoperative and intraoperative warming than intraoperative warming alone during operation. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical guideline 65 recommends prewarming to prevent perioperative hypothermia. However, prewarming it is not routinely performed due to practical restrictions. It is easy to overlook temperature of patient when performing regional anesthesia for postoperative analgesia before induction of general anesthesia. Horn et al. [17] have demonstrated that prewarming for 15 minutes before and after epidural analgesia is effective in preventing perioperative hypothermia. However, prewarming during regional procedure without using additional time has not been reported previously.
There have been some controversial results about optimal duration of prewarming. Although some experiments have revealed that 30 minutes of prewarming is needed to gain heat content exceeding the amount of redistribution [14], another study has shown that prewarming for 20 minutes can reduce the risk of perioperative hypothermia [18]. Jo et al. [19] have conducted controlled trial and found that prewarming for 20 minutes cannot reduce the incidence of intraoperative hypothermia. However, it has effect on the severity of hypothermia. Although the duration of prewarming was different among our patients, our results showed that short time (median duration of ISBPB procedure in group F: 14 min, range: 9–23 min) of prewarming was effective in preventing perioperative hypothermia. Therefore, it would be important to perform prewarming although the prewarming time during ISBPB procedure before general anesthesia is short. Lim et al. [20] have shown that ISBPB procedure can reduce the risk of perioperative hypothermia caused by anesthetic-impaired thermoregulation by decreasing the requirement of general anesthetics. The temperature of our patients could have been higher than that in the study of Lim et al. [20] due to prewarming and intraoperative warming in our study.
As a limitation of our study, there was difference of the duration of ISBPB procedure for each patient. However, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. Although temperature of tympanic membrane was measured preoperatively and postoperatively, esophageal temperature was measured only intraoperatively due to restriction of surgical position. Duration of anesthesia and surgery and the amount of irrigation fluids were different between two groups although statistically insignificant. Duration of hypothermia was not recorded because body temperature recovery (> 36°C) in PACU was not evaluated.
The temperature of patients in this study was higher than that in another study [6] regardless of whether relatively large amount of irrigation fluid was used. This might be due to the fact that we used intraoperative forced-air warming for all patients in this study. Further studies are needed to address the effect of the amount of irrigation fluid on temperature of patients.
In previous studies, warmed irrigation fluid and forced-air warming during surgery have been found to be ineffective in preventing core temperature decrease [6,12]. In addition, intraoperative forced-air warming is only effective at 60 minutes after surgery [12]. Therefore, raising peripheral temperature in advance might be meaningful in preventing core temperature decrease due to body heat redistribution.
In conclusion, short-term prewarming using forced-air warming device during ISBPB procedure in arthroscopic shoulder surgery has beneficial effect on perioperative hypothermia.