INTRODUCTION
Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α
2 adrenergic receptor (AR) agonist which has been in the spotlight because of its analgesic properties and sedative effect without respiratory depression [
1]. Recently, its clinical applications have been expanded beyond use in the intensive care unit and operating room. The additional properties of dexmedetomidine, such as anxiolysis, reducing anesthetic requirement when used as an adjuvant, and cardiovascular stability, can be attractive factors when considering the use of dexmedetomidine in pregnant women [
2]. Several trials of dexmedetomidine have been conducted in the obstetrics field, such as application as an adjuvant analgesic with remifentanil during labor [
3], as an adjuvant during general anesthesia for cesarean sections in normal pregnancies [
4], in a parturient with preeclampsia [
5], or as the sole sedative during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia [
6]. However, there are some concerns for the use of dexmedetomidine for obstetric anesthesia, such as changes in uterine contractions after labor and fetal effects by placental transfer [
2]. Although some human and animal studies reported that dexmedetomidine increased spontaneous contractions of the myometrium [
7-
9], the studies used relatively low concentrations of dexmedetomidine in vitro, which seem insufficient in clinical use [
10]. Also, there are some conflicting reports that clonidine, a non-selective α
2 AR agonist, did not affect uterine contractions and that α
2 AR does not participate in the contractile response of the myometrium [
11].
In this study, we evaluated the effects of dexmedetomidine on oxytocin-induced contractions of the myometrium in pregnant rats. We also calculated the effective concentration for changes in the contractile profiles and compared them with the clinical concentration of dexmedetomidine used for sedation.
DISCUSSION
Dexmedetomidine is a unique drug that regulates the release of neurotransmitters with highly selective α
2 AR agonism. The α AR is located at both presynaptic and postsynaptic sites [
16], but clinical interest in dexmedetomidine is focused on the presynaptic α
2 AR, which controls the release of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and norepinephrine by negative feedback [
17]. The effects of dexmedetomidine via α
2 AR are mediated by a second messenger system or ion channel through guanine-nucleotide regulatory binding protein activation [
17].
Previously, the stimulation of α
2 AR was shown to cause increases in the contractile force of the myometrium via the influx of extracellular Ca
2+ through the G protein signal transduction pathway. Kitazawa et al. [
18] reported that clonidine increased the contractile force of porcine myometrium by increasing intracellular Ca
2+ without changing 3,5-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels. However, there is a possibility that α
2 stimulation by dexmedetomidine may increase uterine contractility by reducing cAMP formation by inhibiting adenylate cyclase [
17]. In contrast, there is also a possibility that dexmedetomidine-induced α
2 stimulation may decrease uterine contractility by reducing the ATP, norepinephrine, and intracellular conductance of calcium by negative feedback [
17,
19]. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine on the contractility of rat myometrium.
In the current study, we first conducted a pilot study to investigate differences in the contractile profile of the myometrium according to dexmedetomidine concentrations and determine the concentrations for the probit analysis, in which the concentration-response of dexmedetomidine on pregnant myometrial strips was evaluated. The results of the pilot study showed that the contractile profile of myometrium induced by oxytocin did not change significantly at dexmedetomidine concentrations from 10-6 to 10-5 M. A significant decrease was seen in active tension at 10-3 M and the number of contractions at 10-4 M. Interestingly, a complete loss of contractions was found at 10-2 M. These results suggest that the α2 AR of the myometrium may display biphasic effects according to the concentration of dexmedetomidine.
According to previous studies, dexmedetomidine increased the contractility of rat myometrium at concentrations of 10
-9 M to 10
-5 M [
7], and in a human myometrial strip at clinical plasma concentrations of 10
-9 g/ml, which were calculated as 2.53 × 10
-3 M in vitro [
8]. Our results, which showed no significant changes in contractions at concentrations of 10
-6 to 10
-4 M, were inconsistent with the results of the previous studies. Previous studies differed from the current study in that they did not use oxytocin to stimulate the myometrium. Myometrial contractions are regulated by depolarization triggered by intracellular Ca
2+ influx and calcium plays a key role in this mechanism [
20]. Ocal et al. [
9] reported that dexmedetomidine increased spontaneous contraction forces in a dose-dependent manner, but there was no change in late-term pregnancy rats when Ca
2+-free solution was used. Oxytocin increases intracellular Ca
2+ influx, which is a major mechanism of uterine contractions [
20]. After labor, increased oxytocin stimulates uterine contractions, and we used oxytocin to create a similar biological environment [
21]. Without oxytocin, the baseline contractility is decreased compared to when oxytocin is used, and this could be the reason for the discrepant results. Moreover, we evaluated changes in uterine contractility at higher concentrations of dexmedetomidine. The maximal concentrations of dexmedetomidine in previous studies were 10
-5 M [
7] and 10
-4 M [
9]. However, we found a significant decrease in active tension at 10
-3 M dexmedetomidine. Specifically, both the contractile force and the number of contractions disappeared at 10
-2 M dexmedetomidine. These results suggest that an occupation of the α AR of the myometrium above a certain level may relax the uterus.
Several hypotheses could explain how dexmedetomidine decreases myometrial contractility. First, the excessive stimulation of α
2 AR may produce uterine relaxation by inhibiting α
1 ARs. Kyozuka et al. [
22] found that postsynaptic α
2 AR may exist on the plasma membrane of rat myometrial smooth muscles and has no contractile function. However, they suggested that occupancy by a selective α
2 agonist could competitively interact by occupying sites of the α
1 AR with contractile functions. Second, dexmedetomidine may produce uterine relaxation because of its higher affinity for α
2A and α
2C AR subtypes [
23]. In pregnant rats, α
2A and α
2C AR decrease myometrial contractions, whereas α
2B AR increases them [
24]. Moreover, the expression of α
2 AR subtypes is related to gestational hormones and affected by the levels of progesterone. In the non-pregnant uterus, an α
2 AR agonist did not cause myometrial contractions [
24]. Hajagos-Toth et al. [
25] suggested the use of α
2C agonists and α
2B antagonists with progesterone for reducing uterine contraction in the treatment of preterm labor. These results indicate that dexmedetomidine may produce uterine relaxation by the stimulation of α
2A and α
2C AR subtypes.
In the current study, we also compare the calculated concentration from the in vitro study with the clinical concentration of dexmedetomidine for the sedation. According to clinical research on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dexmedetomidine, dexmedetomidine showed a significant sedative effect when the plasma concentrations were maintained between 0.2 and 0.3 ng/ml [
10]. This plasma concentration was about 8.45 × 10
-1 M to 1.27 × 10
0 M, given that the molecular weight of the dexmedetomidine is 236.74 g/mol. The effective concentrations are 5.07 × 10
-2 M to 7.69 × 10
-2 M in vitro because the protein binding of dexmedetomidine is 94% [
10]. These concentrations are similar to the EC
95 of dexmedetomidine to inhibit active tension (5.16 × 10
-2 M) and the number of myometrial contractions (2.08 × 10
-2 M) in the current study. Thus, there is a possibility that uterine contractility might be decreased when dexmedetomidine is used for sedation in pregnant women, which may cause problems after delivery. However, we cannot be sure whether those hypotheses can be applied to clinical situations because there are significant differences between species.
There were several limitations to our study. We did not evaluate the responses after the simultaneous stimulation or inhibition of adrenergic receptors. It is possible that interactions between the receptors could regulate uterine contractions. Also, there would be interactions and feedback mechanisms between α AR and other physiologic receptors. The results of the current study were not validated in humans. Thus, a well-designed clinical study is needed for the safe use of dexmedetomidine in pregnant women.
In conclusion, active tension of the myometrium did not change at concentrations of dexmedetomidine less than 10-4 M but showed a significant decrease at concentrations higher than 10-3 M. The EC95 of dexmedetomidine to inhibit active tension and the number of contractions was 4.88 × 10-5 M and 2.55 × 10-5 M, respectively. The use of dexmedetomidine at clinical concentrations in pregnant women has the potential to relax uterine muscles, so further research is needed for the safe use of dexmedetomidine in the obstetrics field.