 |
|
Evaluation of changes in anesthetic methods for cesarean delivery: an analysis for 5 years using the big data of the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service
Ji In Park, Sang Hi Park, Min Seok Kang, Gil Won Kang, Sang Tae Kim
Anesth Pain Med. 2020;15(3):305-313. Published online 2020 Jul 31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.20021
|
|
Citations to this article as recorded by
 Reasons for Using Different Methods of Anesthesia in Cesarean Section in Selected Teaching Hospitals Located in Khuzestan Province
Shirin Shirzad, Mahdi Amraei, Maryam Atrbaghkar, Farzad Faraji Khiavi
Jundishapur Scientific Medical Journal.2023; 22(1): 110. CrossRef Association between anesthetic method and postpartum hemorrhage in Korea based on National Health Insurance Service data
Yongho Jee, Hyun Jung Lee, Youn Jin Kim, Dong Yeon Kim, Jae Hee Woo
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.2022; 17(2): 165. CrossRef General anesthesia for cesarean section: are we doing it well?
Sung Uk Choi
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.2022; 17(3): 256. CrossRef Effect of anesthesia type on outcome measures in cesarean section in the presence of fetal macrosomia
Fatma Nurgül Taşgöz, Nermin Kılıçarslan
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira.2022; 68(10): 1410. CrossRef Anesthetic management of obese and morbidly obese parturients
Sang Tae Kim
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.2021; 16(4): 313. CrossRef
|